UFO's & Nuclear Energy | A Decades Long Connection
UFO's & Nuclear Energy | A Decades Long Connection
Government reports show legitimate concern across departments about UFO's appearing near nuclear installations going back to the 1940's, including an incident where nuclear weapons were disarmed.
There’s a lot of mystery surrounding the UFO topic. Where could these craft be coming from? How were they made and by who? Why are they here? Surely there are more questions than answers on this issue. But at least one burning question has been solved. There’s technology that humans can not reproduce with our current understanding of science flying over us. It’s been observed by thousands of credible witnesses and detection instruments. These objects being seen today have been well documented with near identical descriptions that have been in multiple extensive government reports on these objects dating back to the 40’s and 50’s. I need everyone to understand there are basic, yet reality shifting facts about this phenomenon that have been observed and verified for decades. This information has been actively suppressed by the US government.
UFO researcher Richard Geldreich recently published a declassified report he found available at the National Investigative Committee on Aerial Phenomenon (NICAP). The report was about meeting held at Los Alamos Laboratories with leading scientists in the Department of Energy, 2 Majors from the Army, an Air force Captain, a Navy Commander of a nuclear base, and a University Professor all with top secret clearance, tasked with looking into multiple reports of UFOs over nuclear installations. They discussed a collection of incidents that had been filtered for similarity in characteristics observed and the quality of the observers credibility.
“Approximately 210 incidents have been reported. Among the observers reporting on such incidents are trained and experienced U.S. Weather Bureau personnel, USAF rated officers, experienced civilian pilots, technicians associated with various research projects and technicians employed by commercial airlines.”
Dr. Edward Teller, one of the leading physicists who contributed to the creation of the atomic bomb was consulted to address the possibility that these sighting were advanced technology from the US or another country. Direct quotes from the meeting, including the mathematical explanations disproving any technology available at time are available in the declassified report.
The official conclusion after Dr. Tellers analysis:
“It’s my belief that these phenomena particularly if there are any further incidents are deserving of serious consideration until their source and meaning have been satisfactorily explained. Although Dr. Teller discussion tends to disprove the hypothesis that guided missiles or informer vehicles are responsible, there is cause for concern of the continued occurrences of unexplainable phenomena of this nature in the vicinity of sensitive installations.”
Immediately following this summary of Dr. Tellers analysis in this report of the Feb 16th meeting, an amendment had to be made to note that the very next day there were 2 separate UFO sightings reported by the captain of the Sandia base where nuclear weapons were stored. "*Captain Neef reports blue fireball visible from Sandia at 05:30 17, Feb 1949, and a yellow-orange cigar shaped light at 17:59, visible until 18:06 17 Feb.” These objects fit the exact description of incidents that were discussed at the meeting as well as UFO’s described in sightings and captured on video to this day.
Dr Lincoln LaPaz who’s considered a pioneer in the study of meteors also contributed to the meeting. Like Dr. Teller, Dr. LaPaz nuanced mathematical analysis is available in the report. In short, he uses his expertise to rule out the possibility of these sightings at nuclear installations being meteors based on sound that would have been created, the trajectory of the object and the color observed. While he was providing analysis on all the documented incidents covered at the meeting, Dr. Lapaz came to the conclusion that the specific kind of UFO he personally observed couldn’t have been a meteor:
“the fireball which I personally witnessed on the night of December 12 1948, was not, in my opinion, a conventional meteor fall. Since the majority of the green fireballs have been reported to me, both before and after this December 12th occurrence, possess almost all the properties which I personally observed the night of December 12th, I feel that in all probability they are not themselves conventional meteor falls.”
The next year an official order was given by the US Air Force to destroy all existing copies of this report.
September 24, 1957 a letter was sent to Alan H Belmont who’d eventually become Assistant FBI director with the subject “Unidentified Flying Object Reported On September 20 1957. In the letter there is clear concern about the incident.
“radar stations at Montauk Point, Long Island New York, and Benton, Pennsylvania, detected an unidentified object proceeding in a westward direction with an altitude of 50,000 feet and a speed of 2000 knots (approximately 2,300 miles per hour on September 20, 1957.”
IAC (Intelligence Advisory Committee) evaluation of this report reflected that “it is highly improbable that a Soviet operation is responsible for the unidentified flying object reports of September 20”
the letter continues “The radar pickups now reflect speed variations in the objects course ranging from 1,500 miles per hour to 4,500 miles per hour. This latter speed is improbable according to U.S scientific theory for any type of flying object which this could conceivably be.”
A letter with them same subject was sent the day before. It mentions a “Watch Committee” had a “special meeting” where they briefed the white house on the incident the day after it occurred. Apparently the radar at the Benton station was tracking the object for 9 minutes. Then “Thereafter, jamming was reported by separate radar stations as far as Chicago.” Jamming radar signals is considered an act of war. This gives you an idea of how seriously the nation security apparatus would take an incident like this.
On October 13, 1950 a letter was sent to the , FBI director marked “Urgent”. It was included in the report. “USAF radar installation at Knoxville at 11:25pm est, October 12th, picked up indications of eleven objects and perhaps more traveling across controlled area of atomic energy installation at Oak Ridge.”
October 15, 1950 another sighting at Oak Ridge. This time four eye witnesses provide incredibly detailed incident reports of an object a mile away the size of 4 or 5 passenger planes that changed shape. One of the witnesses Edward Rymer was a Trooper for the Atomic Energy Security Patrol, another was the captain of the Atomic Energy Security Patrol. Rymer and another witness report seeing the object for around 10 minutes. At the same exact time an air traffic controller at the Knoxville airport reports “peculiar reading on radar scopes.”
The very next day on October 16, 5 witnesses report seeing a objects hovering over K-25 (the Manhattan project code name for oak ridge). The commanding officer “sent a fighter aircraft to identify the object.” It did get a reading on its radar at the same time witnesses on the ground say the jet flew under the object they were looking at.
Compare this to the accounts of former military pilots who testified in front of congress a few months ago. Like Commander David Fravors’ Tik-Tac incident, trained military operators reporting objects behaving unlike any known technology observed visually, by the most advanced detection equipment, and multiple witnesses at the same time. Ryan Graves reports that there were times multiple UFO’s could be observed every day near his air base sounds even more believable after seeing how many documented incidents occurred at Oak Ridge alone.
Currently members of the UFO caucus in the house of representatives report a military pilot at Eglin Air Force base approached his representative to give them proof of UFO incidents that have occurred while in flight. To this day the Commanding General at the base refuses to give members of the oversight committee the video they’ve requested allegedly because they don’t have the proper security clearance (they do) and oversight authority, which they obviously do.
One of the most shocking reports of UFO’s and nuclear weapons is the Malmstrom incident. In March 1967 at Malmstrom Air Force Base security guards report seeing strange objects over the base. Robert Salas, the base commander at the time of the incidents who was operating in the underground bunker got a call from the main security guard about the lights. Soon after the alarms were going off throughout the base and the 10 nuclear missiles at the base were taken offline. Fighter pilots were sent to secure the base. Robert Salas says the missiles remained offline for 24 hours. According to Salas and other who were present, it would be considered an incident if one missile went offline on it’s own but it was unprecedented to have more than one nuclear missile offline. At Malmstrom 10 nuclear weapons went down at the same time. If they president gave the order to fire a missile they would be unable to carryout the order.
Documents that John Greenwald obtained on the incident show there was an investigation that tested every conceivable malfunction with the help of defense contractors at Boeing who built the systems to explain what happened. There was no final explanation for what caused the shutdown. While going down the list of possible causes and tests to identify them there was a brief mention of UFO’s. But unlike every other possible explanation there was no thorough debunking. There were no eye witness statements included.
“Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects around the area of echo flight during the time of fault were disproven. A mobile strike team, which had checked all November Flights LF’s the morning of 16, March 67, were question and stated that no unusual activity or sighting were observed.” Salas says the Pentagon covered up the UFO’s involvement in the event. At this point it’s clear the military was investigating the issue of UFO’s and nukes seriously. So to immediately dismiss the possibility that a UFO was responsible for the extraordinary incident with no real follow up is inconsistent with their documented concern on this issue. What is consistent is the Air Force willingness to suppressing proof that something is demonstrating air superiority over nuclear facilities. For that I reference you back to the document I already included from the air force ordering the destruction of that detailed report on UFO’s at at nuclear bases.
The objects seen over nuclear bases in the 40’s and 50’s weren’t meteors. There’s no way these machines originated in US research. This is the conclusion of Dr. Teller who at the time just worked on the most secretive weapons program in the world. Even if you think Dr. Teller was wrong in his analysis back then, and there was a secret weapons program that none of the scientists and military leadership in that room were aware of. Why would that technology still be hidden almost 80 years later? The technology described in the 40’s is beyond what we can do today. If the US had unmatched physics bending weaponry I would think we’d have found some time to use it in an of our numerous military interventions around the world over the decades. If another country was able to dominate our air space including over nuclear weapons sites we’d also know about it. People and equipment are observing the same objects today that were seen 80 years ago.
This is a drop in the bucket of well documented UFO incidents and investigations since the 1930’s. It strains credulity to insist there is nothing to this issue. I’m bored with the question “are some of the UFO’s seen technology outside our current understanding of science?” UFO’s clearly have some interest in US military bases, specifically nuclear installations. What we all should be asking is how many times have fighter jets been sent to intercept UFO’s where a resolution has never been made about what exactly the object was or where it came from?