In part 1 we covered two highly influential journalists Max Blumenthal and Lee Fang fallacious attempts at discrediting the UFO topic. As I reiterated throughout the article, skepticism and question claims are welcomed. If anyone has evidence that all the current whistleblower and witnesses are part of some massive coordinated psyop, I’d love to see the evidence. The problem arises when journalists are pushing a narrative that the facts do not support.
In the absence of solid evidence confirming a psyop, Max and Lee’s argument relies mostly on cherry picking an out of context UFO document from 70 years while conveniently ignoring mountains of documents that contradict their psyop narrative. Additionally Lee Fang goes on to display a comical level of hypocrisy by uncritically citing a Wall St Journal article full of factual inaccuracies and cockamamie tales from anonymous DoD sources to discredit whistleblowers and witnesses from the DoD.
In their latest attempt to explain why so many people are telling the same story about UFO crash retrieval programs, anonymous sources from AARO, the DoD office Congress setup to investigate these claims, are now suggesting that there was a decades long hazing ritual in the Air Force that went out of control. Allegedly thousands of Air Force officers were briefed in a SCIF about a fake reverse engineering program and made to sign fake NDAs about the fake program Named Yankee Blue.
Since no one ever told these thousands of officers this was all just a jokey joke, they all still believe this program is real years later. It’s worth noting WSJ didn’t interview any of these officers nor did they produce a single one of these NDAs that thousands of people allegedly signed. None of these giant red flags gave Lee Fang any pause. It fits his narrative about this being one big psyop so who gives a shit.
This kind of journalistic malpractice isn’t just limited to Max Blumenthal and Lee Fang. For nearly 3 years, I’ve watched the biggest figures in new media accuse witnesses of being frauds, liars and disinformation agents working to further some government agenda. It’s been alarming to see this impervious echo chamber work in real time. No degree of slanderous speculation is off limits. It’s the default position for an uncomfortable amount of people that the government is about to fake an alien invasion to implement a One World Government.
This outlandish theory is spread with impunity because it’s understood there will be no push back. Their audience won’t demand any evidence nor will their peers. It’s just become a free for all of endless psyop mongering without ever having to engage with any evidence that outright contradicts this narrative.
Aside from the decades of research into the topic, none of these psyop mongers can account for basic facts that counter their claims. This is an intricate multi-agency psyop which also includes committees in the House and Senate why isn’t there one coherant message coming from everyone involved? The witnesses and whistleblowers are filing criminal complaints with several Inspectors General offices, including complaints of retaliation. Why are all UFO witnesses who testified to AARO and other investigative bodies accusing the office of lying to congress and refusing to follow up the actionable leads provided? Why is it that leadership from AARO continues to publicly misrepresent whistleblowers testimony while attacking their credibility? Why did that same AARO give a contract to a firm that specializes in tracking and stopping whistleblowers while actively soliciting testimony from whistleblowers?
The psyop claims don’t even stand up to mild scrutiny yet this heavily reinforced echo chamber makes it so there isn’t ever any real meaningful push back to this nonsense. News influencers have no incentive to actually spend time doing the research into the topic. Many of them suffer from audience capture and wouldn’t risk disagreeing with the majority of their paying audience on this or any other issue. Like I’ve mentioned, all their peers are pushing the psyop narrative. It takes an incredible amount of internal fortitude to go against the grain in this space knowing that the moment you deviate from the approved dogma you risk losing opportunities to be promoted to a larger audience or being removed from popular group chats with other content creators.
As for the audience, there’s also no incentive for them to research the topic either. All your favorite news influencers and social media circles are constantly reinforcing the theory the whole UFO topic is a psyop: who wants to be the idiot who spend hours if not days looking into the story any further? If everyone is in consensus that this is all a big distraction, by definition you’d be a fool to spend any amount of time looking into it right?
At this moment we all have a unique opportunity to follow any number of leads on what may be the most complex nuanced topic I’ll ever cover. The implications of there actually being a UFO reverse engineering program is massive. Advanced technology, new forms of energy, a reckoning for an unaccountable deep state stealing billions and operating with no oversight are all on the table not to mention all the implications of acknowledging technologically advanced civilizations may be interacting with the planet.
Instead of addressing any of this, the alleged free thinkers in the new media space are enforcing group think with brain rot psyop theories. Somehow the independent thinkers, with very few exceptions, are actively discouraging their audience from doing any research or critical thinking into the UFO topic. In parts 2 and 3 we’ll continue covering this echo chamber which reaches from Ben Shapiro to figures like Whitney Webb.
Ben Shapiro
“There are no aliens” Ben Shapiro confidently declared in a video titled “UFOs Are A Bullcrap Distraction” posted soon after David Grusch testified to Congress in 2023. Just like many others who make such definitive claims with no supporting evidence, Shapiro relies on good ol’ non falsifiable claims to prove his point.
“Do you think that if Donald Trump actively knew that there were aliens and UFOs in possession of the US government he wouldn’t have just tweeted it in 5 seconds?”
Well thank you Ben. Now decades of well sourced research are null and void because a scenario you just imagined in your head on the fly didn’t happen. Trump also never tweeted the location of all the US nuclear assets. Does that mean they don’t exist as well? Trump is the most unpredictable politician to take office. But Ben Shapiro is apparently the Trump whisperer and knows exactly how he would react upon receiving information.
In the same video Shapiro continues to display the tactics of an intellectual titan by graduating from non-falsifiable claims to misrepresenting easily verifiable facts about the story. “Perhaps Grusch is telling truth about what he think he has seen but also if he has seen a document of what another person seen from a third source, I’m just going to go no..” Ben is responding to clip that he just played where Grusch clearly states his information is coming from “the assessment of people with direct knowledge of the program that I talked to who are currently still on the program.” Why is it so hard for detractors to engage directly with what Grusch has been saying? How do you warp him clearly stating his testimony is informed by first hand witnesses to Grusch got his information from third and fourth hand sources in all of 5 seconds?
But that just shows Shapiro is working backwards from his conclusion. If you’re going to pretend that interviewing over 40 people with first hand knowledge carries the same weight as if he was just repeating what he heard during a game of telephone you have some pretty shitty analysis.
Whitney Webb
Whitney Webb is a well known journalist and co-founder of online outlet “Unlimited Hangout.” On twitter alone web has over 680,000 followers. She’s also a contributor with the large independent media outlet The Last American Vagabond. Whitneys reach is genuinely incalculable as she has the ability to go on nearly all of the largest news and politics podcasts in the world. When she makes declarations in this space people listen.
In a tweet thread posted after Grusch testified Whitney Webb shares her version of the rehashed decades old Project Blue Beam theory that this all a ploy for a One World Government. I’ll get to the wildly unsourced origins of Blue Beam theory in a moment. Essentially Webb claims this all part of some plot to scare people into believing aliens are real so that they welcome a one world government to deal with the threat.
In a tweet with nearly 500,000 views Webb suggests that as a result of believing intelligence officials with no evidence the public will “then panic and demand that all of humanity bands together to make a global govt just like in Star Trek and Mass Effect [because] ‘the aliens’?”
Well first, it’s been nearly 3 years since this post and I’m seeing no suggestions from the whistleblowers or literally anyone to form a one world government. Precisely when can we decide this prediction is false or is it non-falsifiable because that one world government reveal is always right around the corner?
This prediction objectively didn’t come to pass. But the impression left upon her audience, who largely accept her commentary as gospel is that Whitney was spot on yet again. As a journalist you’d think Webb would feel some compulsion to learn the facts of the case before attacking the credibility of a whistleblower by using TV shows and video games as a reference.
In addition to her prediction not happening, it’s built on a flawed logic that doesn’t even withstand mild scrutiny. The same war machine that makes trillions from endless wars and stealing natural resources is also trying to trick everyone into willingly accepting a one world government? If you have any evidence at all that these elites are actively working on a plan to undermine the trillion dollar war industry that they’ve set up since WWII, please share. Are they blood thirsty warmongers profiting from endless war or do they want humanity to stop fighting and work together against the imaginary aliens they invented? Those seem like contradictory goals.
Furthermore, I’d love a coherent explanation from people like Whitney Webb for why the global elites who dictate policy for countries around the world need to come up with such an elaborate and risky plot for a one world government?
They already own all politicians of the most powerful countries in the world by typical run of the mill corruption like legalized bribery, the revolving door between public and private sector, NGOs like the WHO or WEF, and even secret societies like Skull and Bones.
It seems like a bunch of unnecessary steps for world domination when corporations and the establishment operate with impunity as is. If it’s a requisite for anyone who brings up UFOs to have evidence of their claims and you’re going to assert a new outlandish claim as an alternative you need to also provide evidence.
In the tweet thread Webb says “my point is this is happening in Congress right now for a specific purpose and critical thinking is important. It’s a controlled release of info (whether true or false is irrelevant) with an ulterior motive”
This is my exact problem with new medias approach. What do you mean whether it’s true or not as if that’s some ancillary detail? If there’s information coming out confirming an advanced alien presence has visited earth, I feel that the starting point of journalists should be to assess the available information with such reverberating consequences is true before spinning elaborate tails about what the intent of the people transmitting the information.
If the information is true, there needs to be serious reckoning and the public needs to decide how to proceed from here. If it’s not then you have evidence that this is one big psyop for nefarious purposes. I don’t get why it seems new media journalists feel it’s appropriate to work backwards from their conclusion without establishing a baseline of factual evidence. Why is everyone so afraid of simply doing their job and investigating the claims being made?
Project Blue Beam
Whitney Webb and many other psyop mongers have somehow been convinced that Project Blue Beam is happening. It made me wonder what evidence was so compelling that they all would swear up and down that this explains everything.
Project Blue Beam was a claim made by a single source with no first hand knowledge named Serge Monast in 1994 who provided no documents to support his theory. Monast claimed that the government would use holographic technology to display images of religious figures like Jesus Christ in the skies around the world to trick people into believing it was Armageddon and to obey the authority of the One World Government. Monast even makes the wild claim that all of the thousands of abduction encounters were all staged by the government to test out the tractor beams that they will be using to lift people into the sky as part of their fake rapture moment.
I would love to know who on the project decided this approach was best logistically and as far as operation security. You’d think the government would have a more discrete and efficient way to test their lift technology for this big super secret event than abducting and returning thousands of people around the world. It seems Serge Monast was one of the pioneers of trying to dismiss thousands of accounts backed with varying levels of circumstantial and direct evidence by pulling delusion unsourced theories out of the ether.
At some point in this theory proposed by Monast, the New World Order government was really going drive it home by using frequencies from satellites to beam telepathic communications into brains of everyone on earth to make them think God was talking to them.
To prove his point that “mind control technology” is being used to directly influence politics, he cites a conspiracy theory I’ve never even heard before and can find no mention of anywhere. According to Monast Michael Dukakis was targeted with microwave weapons to “impede his speaking performance” after he started leading George H.W Bush in the opinion polls for the 1987 presidential election.
I’ve spent nearly 3 years digging through source material to find evidence to inform my position on the topic. I’ve read 60 year old correspondence of leading nuclear scientist James Tuck working at our National Laboratories while investigating UFO sightings and propulsion. I’ve read a DIA analysis on medical injuries associated with UFO sightings such as the Cash Landrum incident and others. I’ve read a scientific analysis done by a NASA Pioneer Paul Hill published in a book named “Unconventional Flying Objects.” A 1979 report from a NASA physicist Alan Holt on a possible explanation for UFO propulsion. This is just a fraction of research material I’ve consumed, yet I’m being told not to believing my lying eyes because the uncorroborated ramblings of Monast says its all fake.
It’s almost insulting that I even have to respond to this baseless psyop theorizing as a opposed to an interrogation of the actual source material I’ve collected. But this is the default position of the prominent news influencers online and now their audience. A lot of the pushback in my own audience comes from who fully believe Blue Beam is a real plan.
Here’s some sweet sweet irony for you. The same one’s crowing about UFO allegations being unsourced have no problem believing an even crazier theory with even less primary source evidence.
I dare you to ask anyone screeching about Project Blue Beam to cite one source and watch them squirm. Because they have nothing other than speculation from Serge Monast. And it’s not like he had a great track record either. He also predicted that the US government and UN were actively working on a plan to build concentration camps to put everyone in preparation for the New World Order. In the same book on Blue Beam, Monast claims “ it is the basic teaching of the United Nations that no one owns his or her own personality.”
I have a lot of criticism of the UN that centers around the proven fact that at its core, it’s a tool of empire. It preserves the patina that international law exists but in reality they provide no check on the biggest violators of international law. Look no further than the genocide of Palestinian, the Iran War, the Iraq War, Syria Afghanistan etc.
But people like Serge Monast can just make shit up like the UNs basic teachings are that no one can have their own personality, and his other proclamations are presented as unimpeachable by new media personalities howling about “where’s the facts and evidence” from UFO whistleblowers.
It’s truly unbelievable how confirmation bias and an unchecked echo chambers has cemented this Blue Beam belief in people’s head so much so that no amount of evidence can shake them from the belief that this massive psyop is always right around the corner.
Nick Cruse
Nick Cruse is a content creator on YouTube and Twitter who focuses on news and politics. Just like many of the others pushing the psyop theory, whenever a UFO story gets too much attention his knee-jerk reaction is to call it a psyop. 2 months after Grusch testified to Congress in 2023 he shared a TikTok video that he made claiming the topic is just a distraction from the stories he thought we should be talking about instead saying he “predicts a conspiracy within a conspiracy.” If you were to guess that sounds like the prelude to evidence free speculation, you’d be correct.
Nick suggests these stories are planted to distract from the US funding Nazis in Ukraine, COVID policies and lock downs, and the Hunter Biden Joe Biden corruption scandals. It three years later. The Covid drama is done, Biden is out of office and not even Nick isn’t prioritizing covering the ongoing Ukraine war anymore. The UFO topic still persists. Is this not evidence to suggest the story is bigger and more nuanced than Nick was willing to acknowledge? I don’t expect a correction or a reevaluation of these bold unfounded proclamations anytime soon.
Nick, like many others in this series suggest that there’s a direct agenda to increase military funding with the UFO psyop. The Pentagons budget increases by hundreds of billions of dollars every year. It’s well over a trillion dollars now. Will Nick or anyone else elaborate on why such a complex cockamamie scheme would be necessary to increase defense spending when they already get whatever they want to fund all the endless wars we’re engaged in?
Also, does it matter even a little bit that the people directly involved with investigating these programs have explicitly advocated cutting the Pentagon’s funding and suggesting that they are perpetuating the UFO coverup is at least in part to protect the profits of the war machine?
Congressman Tim Burchett, part of the UFO caucus in Congress spoke to reporters after the Grusch hearing. His comments were definitively opposed to the out of control war machine budget. Burchett makes the argument that these craft must be using a new form of energy and propulsion and if were made public it would put the “war pimps” in the Pentagon put of business:
“That would put the pentagon out of business. We wouldn’t be fighting these worthless wars oversees over oil and our boys and girls wouldn’t be dying. It would put the war pigs out of business. They’d have to go somewhere else and I’m all for it.”
How do you take comments like that and spin it into this must be psyop for more pentagon funding? It’s ridiculous. The only way you can reach that conclusion is if you’ve done no research into the actual dynamics at play and are just working backwards from your conclusions.
Robbie Martin
Robbie Martin is the brother of independent journalist Abby Martin. The two have collaborated on numerous projects such as documentaries and articles. He also hosts a podcast and is often a guest on larger platforms to share his views. Robbie has been another influencer on the UFO psyop bandwagon. In one tweet Martin believes he’s cracked the psyop code with his theory that this is just one big bluff by the US to trick adversaries into believing we have super secret magical technology. Points for creativity, but like all these other theories it requires you to ignore a huge amount of evidence and make multiple leaps in logic.
There are accounts of crash retrievals and government coverups for 80 years. So even when the US had technology supremacy and nuclear weapons as the only super power post WWII, the deep state was playing the long game by making everyone believe we have UFOs? Yeah I’m sure that’s exactly what happened. Also how does this account for millions of sightings and encounters around the world going back at least to WWII? Are all these experiencers in France, Brazil, Peru, Mexico, the UK, Uruguay etc lying to boost the image of US technical prowess?
In one tweet Martin says “the idea that US Defense Contractors secretly back engineered UFO propulsion technology is one of the funniest and most obvious US intelligence psyops in history to scare adversarial countries.” Does Robbie provide a shred of evidence or have a single source to cite? Of course not. In this build your own psyop space, boldly declaring your opinion as fact will suffice.
Unfortunately for Robbie I’ve actually looked into the involvement of defense contractors in these UFO programs. There are a numerous witnesses and corresponding records that show defense contractors involved in the study of UFOs going back to the 1950’s. In my research I also came across an interesting attempt by one of the biggest corporate law firms in the world to block legislation that would force contractors to disclose all their UFO records including physical evidence such as craft and alien bodies.
Robert Wood
Robert Wood was an engineer who worked at McDonnell which later became Boeing for over 30 years. Wood worked on a range of products from Missile systems to space programs like Apollo. While at McDonnell Douglas Wood received the equivalent of millions of dollars today to conduct a study on how UFO tech works in order to improve aircraft designs at McDonnell Douglas at with the approval of executives including the CEO. Wood then hired a team of scientists, private investigators and UFO researchers including the respected nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman. They traveled conducting field investigations of sightings and even abduction cases.
The three year long study remained secret for decades until Wood publicly spoke about it in a MUFON publication. Since then hundreds of pages of authentic corporate documents from the study have been published. That seems like a lot of effort for leading scientists to document and pursue fields of UFO related research.
John Schuessler
Additionally John Schuessler another 30 year McDonnell Douglas veteran was also researching UFOs for decades while at the company. Schuessler would retire in the 90s as Boeings Director of Engineering. But since the late 60s he was a primary investigator for multiple UFO incidents such as the Cash Landrum case where 3 witness report a close encounter with a UFO leaving behind unexplainable physical evidence. Schuessler would then go on to be a founding member of MUFON, the largest civilian UFO research organization in the world. For decades Schuessler tried to learn what he could about the UFOs and the associated propulsion tech.
Schuessler took a similar approach to Robert Woods by even incorporating abductees testimony into his technical analysis of UFO propulsion. Raymond Fowler, UFO researcher and a primary investigator of the case recalls sharing information with Schuessler in his book “The Watchers.”
As part of my research for a series I’ve been writing, I found at least five people in the McDonnell Douglas Engineering department with a history of researching UFOs. This isn’t an article on McDonnell Douglas so I won’t dwell on the angle too long. One of the other engineers was Robert Baker, a leader in the engineering field who’s published research and secured patents on gravity manipulation and revolutionary forms of energy both related to UFOs. Baker also testified in the first congressional hearing on UFO in 1968 with multiple leading scientists to urge Congress to support more public investigations.
Another witness is William Tompkins who would make several explosive claims in a series of books published before his death where states that he directly worked on programs related to the reverse engineering of crashed UFO.
David Froning
David Froning is the McDonnell Douglas Engineering I’ve done the most research into. He appears in a number of serious UFO documentaries going back to the 80’s. In these appearances he’s made some bombshell statements. He’s contributed his analysis to investigations of compelling footage. In an episode of the popular series Sightings Froning flat out contradicts NASAs dismissal of a much cited video recorded from a NASA space camera which appears to show a UFO. This was notable since Froning had himself worked on several NASA contracts while at McDonnell Douglas.
In one 1989 documentary “UFOs and Channeling” Froning said “I know one or two scientists and engineers who use channeling to get technical information to help them in their projects.” The suggestion was that scientists were using contacts with aliens for real life projects.
Aside from the documentaries Froning has written 2 books related to UFO propulsion. “Faster than Light - Warp Drive and Quantum Vacuum Power” was even edited by his good friend and witness for Steven Greers Disclosure Project Examiner For The U.S Patent Office Thomas Valone. But the only reason I even came across the name David Froning is because he had worked directly with a witness of UFO whistleblower David Grusch. Froning and Eric Davis worked together on a project funded by the Air Force, NASA, The National Labs, DARPA and several defense contractors to build a literal flying saucer known as the Lightcraft, which I’ve written extensively about.
That’s a considerable amount of highly respected aerospace engineers devoting a considerable amount of time to understanding UFOs but according to Robbie’s galaxy brain theory it’s was all a clever deception to make Russia think we have technology that we don’t actually posses. There’s plenty more evidence that dismantles this baseless speculation from Robbie Martin about defense contractors and reverse engineering allegations.
Lawyers Against Disclosure
More evidence that just puts Robbie’s theory to bed is what appears to be a coverup by the defense contractors who he claims are perpetuating a psyop. I wrote an article about a lobbyist who published a corporate newsletter warning defense contractors about the UFO disclosure act that was attached to the NDAA. The newsletter was explicitly objecting to language in the bill that would force contractors to hand over their UFO records to the national archives and put them on notice that any crashed craft and bodies in their possession could be subject to imminent domain and seized by the government. Barna also openly advised anyone who this bill might apply to, to approach their government partners to demand those parts of the bill be amended or removed.
At face value this is a bizarre newsletter for a lobbyist to write but the amount of conflicts of interest this one lawyer has is jaw dropping. Covington Burling has at one point or another represented most of prime defense contractors accused of being part of the UFO program such as Lockheed Martin and Northrup Grumman.
Additionally Barna isn’t just some random lawyer. Most of her career was spent in the Army prosecutors office and the Army’s General Councils office. This lead to an Undersecretary position at the DoD. From there is her most brazen conflict of interest in the UFO topic. She joined the Senate Armed services committee as their General Council.
As the top lawyer for the committee it was part of her duties to finalize the legal text for the Defense funding bill, the same annual bill with the UFO disclosure act was attached to. But the time Barna was General council also overlaps with when witnesses began coming to the senate armed services and Intel committees to inform them of the illegal UFO program. So a lawyer who was fully of aware of the allegations, goes to work for a firm representing the corporations directly implicated and advised them how to protect their records from being disclosed.
In that same vein, the year the newsletter was written Barnas highest paying lobbying client was a little known corporations named Advanced Technology International. ATI is what’s known as a consortium manager who facilitates hundreds of billions of dollars of top secret defense technology research projects carried out by private institutions for government agencies.
I mentioned in part 1 how AARO had given a contract to firm named Sancorp that specializes in tracking, preventing and stopping whistleblowers. On their website they have two of the consortium managed by ATI listed as “contract vehicles.”
This isn’t a smoking gun but it sure is interesting that one lawyer who had direct access to witnesses testimony in the senate just so happens to be connected to one of the biggest facilitators of public private black budget research and the whistleblowers hunting firm contracted by AARO. Then that same lawyer outlines a strategy for defense contractors to undermine a UFO disclosure bill coming from committee that she served as General council to. And to put a bow on it, the law firm where she published the newsletter just happens to represent the same corporation accused of participating in these UFO crash retrieval programs.
There’s even more information connecting Barna to the UFO topic. But I’d love to know how Robbie and other psyop proponents account for the opposition to transparency about UFOs. You’d think the parties trying to convince us UFOs are real for some nefarious agenda would be waving the files around instead of clearly obfuscating and trying to block their release.
Did a journalists like Robbie Martin never find any of these open source records or is he wildly misrepresenting the totality of evidence connecting defense contractors to UFO reverse engineering? Either way everyone should have pause before taking his unsourced opinion seriously.
Skepticism vs Psyop Mongering
There are far less egregious ways that these psyop mongers can cover this topic from a skeptical perspective.
Would it have killed any of them to simply say “I’m skeptical of these claims but I need more evidence”. How hard is it to say “this seems like a complex topic, I currently don’t have the time or mental bandwidth to fully research the topic but it should be investigated further by someone who can.” Unfortunately humility and meticulous research is not what’s rewarded in the online news space.
The behaviors that are rewarded are hot takes. As long as you can constantly churn out content related to the trending topics of the day that’s all that matters, factual accuracy be damned. Bonus points if your hot takes align with the new media dogma. Mindlessly regurgitating the talking points of the day isn’t a new issue for the online news space. But the negative effects aren’t normally as flagrant when the prevailing wisdom is wars are bad, corruption is bad, and Healthcare is a basic service that should be provided by the government. What’s going on now is something else entirely.
Evidence free smears and character assassination against whistleblowers are now heavily encouraged. You can dress it up however you like, but if you’re calling a whistleblower a liar or disinformation agent with no evidence, how are you any different than the main stream media smear merchants who called Snowden a traitor? The effect is the same. Ignore the substance and bring loaded unproven accusations against someone informing about crimes committed by our government.
Arguably even worse is poisoning the well on the entire UFO topic. Now the free thinkers are insisting that their audience avoid doing their own research and instead take the rampant speculation from uninformed media figures as the final word on the topic. When has such enforced ignorance ever produced positive effects on a media ecosystem?
If anyone credulously watched mainstream media during Russiagate they were told definitively Trump was some Russian agent installed by Vladimir Putin after he rigged the election. To deviate from consensus meant you’re liable to be accused of either directly or indirectly being influenced by Russia to spread their propaganda. For millions of people To this day no amount of evidence or fruitless investigation can sway them from this conspiracy theory.
During covid, critics of the official narrative were told to shut up and trust the science despite the fact that no one, including public health officials were making any decisions based on science. For the first time in my life being accused of “doing your own research” was meant as a pejorative.
Now the edict has come from on high in new media: the UFO topic is a psyop and distraction. This is creating an environment where asking questions and doing research isn’t welcomed. Fortunately for me, I have no problem being a heretic. I follow the facts and evidence as opposed to the new media herd mentality. In part 3 I’ll provide just as many examples to really drive home how ubiquitous the UFO psyop narrative has become.
Support Independent Media
When I began creating content I made the conscious decision that I wouldn’t put any of it behind a paywall. Access to information shouldn’t be limited to those who can pay for it. My more in-depth articles often take months to research, write, and edit for little to no pay. If you want to help me follow the leads and write the articles you won’t find anywhere else please support in any way that you can.